Facilitating Online Discussions
Mary B. Wall, Ph.D.
Facilitating discussions in online classes is a balancing act. I teach
faculty how to improve their online courses, and a question that always arises
is: “How do I guide online discussions?” We want to make sure that students are
going on the right path and really learn something from each other, but we also
do not want to overwhelm the discussion.
I do feel that teachers need to “be present” in online classes. The
biggest complaint from online students is that the teacher is not there. Even
if the teacher may be reading all posts in the discussion, when they do not
participate, or at least give personalized feedback, then students often feel off
in cyberspace alone. Also discussions
can meander and be merely a repetition of the first message. However, being
active and monitoring facilitations does take time. A framework is helpful so that we can
scaffold our responses.
Faculty need to keep students on track but allow for enough student
expression so that the topic develops and students learn from each other. How can teachers push their students to think
deeper on the subject and to make the discussions a learning experience?
Develop
good questions
The first step is to develop good discussion questions. Questions with
one right answer, or questions whose answers can be found in the text, might be
better suited for a quiz or an assignment. Questions that require analysis,
connection to personal experiences, or delving deeper may produce the most
learning and interaction among the students. For example, in a discussion on the use of
portfolios in higher education, students could be asked to apply the readings,
be presented with mini case studies, or discuss the pros and cons. Examples
below are taken from an actual facilitation on portfolios. The facilitator has
given me permission to use her work.
Questions Asking for Application of the
Readings:
How can interactivity be incorporated into the basic
e-portfolio processes of reflection, finalization of projects, incorporation of
projects into an e-portfolio, to enable the possibility of engaging
student-faculty, student-student, or perhaps student-colleague (in the adult)
learning opportunities?
Questions that are Mini Case Studies:
You have volunteered to draft instructions for the reflection
component of the e-portfolio for your department. Your task is to explain to
your students or other portfolio builders why they are composing reflection
statements for each of their portfolio artifacts, to provide concise
instructions for the reflection assignment, and to provide a brief rationale
for your approach.
Discussing Pros and Cons:
Allowing students to select the content of the portfolio is
considered to be very motivating because it connects students to their
e-portfolio and allows them an opportunity to construct their own learning. On
the other hand, some portfolios are used for assessment purposes with students
demonstrating competency by including required portfolio projects, or
artifacts. Discuss the pros and cons of the two approaches to e-portfolio
content. Include ways that the portfolio process can be designed to encourage
students to be motivated and connected to their e-portfolios, that is to say,
how can it be made to be “theirs,” even though the projects may be defined?
Give
Clear Guidelines of What is Expected
Once the questions are formed, then the discussion can
progress. A rubric that is clear and easy to understand helps the process.
Faculty should be sure the students know what we expect of them.
A simple statement like: “No credit for posts like I
agree or Good job will be counted for credit” can give students warning that we
want analysis, not parroting the previous posts, and often it is helpful to
give students examples of good and poor replies.
We must decide if we want students to reply to others. If we do that
should be clearly stated in the instructions, along with how many replies we
expect. Should spelling and grammar count? Will we require all references to be
correctly cited?
Rubrics should not be too involved. The more complicated the rubric the
more difficult and time consuming it will be for the faculty to grade.
A sample rubric for a discussion that is worth 8 points:
2 points
|
1 point
|
0 points
|
Initial postings are
well-developed (at least one full paragraph), use correct spelling and
grammar and introduce new ideas. Clear evidence of critical thinking;
(application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation
|
Some
development of ideas, but spelling and grammar may be a problem or little
evidence of critical thinking.
|
Brief
responses, or no evidence of critical thinking or spelling and grammar a
major problem
|
Response postings are
characterized by clarity of argument, depth of insight into theoretical
issues, originality of treatment and correct spelling and grammar.
|
Response
postings have some depth, originality or insight.
|
Response posts are lacking in depth,
originality or insight.
|
All postings are on time.
|
Postings
are one day late.
|
Postings are more than one day late
|
Participants replied to at least two other participants posts.
Response to your initial posts are collegial but do not count for points.
|
Participants replied to one other participant posts. Response to
initial posts are collegial but do not count for points.
|
No response to others.
|
Monitoring
the Discussion
You may like to review a summary of the text
“Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators” George
Collison, Bonnie Elbaum, Sarah Haavind, Robert Tinker (Atwood Publishing
2000) Summarized by Lisa M. Lane, 2007. http://hub.miracosta.edu/teaching-academy/online/roundtables/collison.pdf
The book is a worthwhile purchase, and
the outline can be used as quick guide. The authors suggest that using various
Tones, Voices and Critical Thinking Guides can direct discussions.
Examples: In a discussion on portfolios noted above, a
facilitator used the material in this text to guide her facilitation (I have
received her permission to share this with you). Notice that the facilitator
always personalizes by using the student’s name. It’s a small thing, but it
makes a difference
Tones , Voices and Critical Thinking, a few examples:.
Tones (Manner of Expression – Encouraging but Probing) :
·
Asking for clarification: “Do you have any
ideas about what direction you would go with those, John?”
·
Nurturing:
“Hi Sam--I can relate to that feeling of discomfort with technology
solutions--we recently started using videoconferencing using Google +, and
although it is great when it works, but sometimes we spend 15-30 minutes
getting set up. Huge time commitment.”
Voices (Seeking Clarification) :
·
Conceptual
facilitator: “Hi Cindy: It sounds like you really got a lot out of the
reflection process. Did that come naturally to you?”
·
Personal
Muse: (Letting students get inside
your head): “Susan, I like your thoughts about
how to get students oriented and comfortable with the reflection
process--backing up and asking questions that lead the student into it sounds
like a great approach. I always find myself stopping as I read a reflection
from a student who is struggling to get beyond "Description" in their
reflections.”
Critical Thinking (Encourage the Poster to Dig Deeper):
·
Sharpening
Focus: Glenn, You mentioned social media and how comfortable
your son is with it. I find the same with my "grown" kids. It is a
part of their everyday lives to connect via twitter and facebook, etc
(Pinterest and more). For me, those are "extras" that I just never
seem to get to, although I do have a Linked-In account. Do those of us from a
time before social media need to get with it? Or can we just leave that for the
younger folks?!
·
Digging
Deeper: Thanks, Stuart --by “overdoing it”, do you mean that we may sometimes
ask students for too much, but that in this case, the miscellaneous is a good
"extra"?
Notice that in each of the examples, the facilitator did
not just accept the student’s message and reply something like “Nice work” or
“Well done.” Those comments, while encouraging, do not guide the learning
process.
Usually, after an initial comment like those above, the
discussion will get back on track and proceed. The facilitator may have to
reply initially to each student’s post, especially at the beginning of the
class. However, as the class continues,
students soon learn from this guidance what is expected and the facilitator’s
need for intervention decreases.
Time Saving Tips
Yes, monitoring
an online discussion takes a lot of time to do well. Faculty have developed
ways to lighten the load;
1.
Using Voice to Text Software. Most faculty can speak
faster than they can type. Using Voice to Text Software enables the faculty to
speak and have their words turned into text. Google now has a Voice to Text app
that I tried and found it works well https://docs.googleblog.com/2016/02/type-edit-and-format-with-your-voice-in.html
2.
Macros. If there are comments that
must be consistently added then it may be worth the time to develop a macro.
For example, if faculty need to give feedback on “This work is late” then
developing a macro key shortcut may reduce the need to write the same comment
over and over. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/record-or-run-a-macro-HA010099769.aspx
3.
Copy and Paste. I give a summary of the
discussion each week after the work is graded. I make sure to highlight the
main points because I know that, especially if the class is large, students
will not read every post. I save these summaries, and review them each time I
teach the course. Then I can quickly make revisions and copy and paste into the
class.
4.
Verbal feedback. Some teachers do give verbal
feedback instead of written. Many students do like this, but by ADA legislation
we need to have a text equivalent for verbal or written information in our
courses.
Guiding
the Discussion is Worth It!
In student evaluations I often find the comment that the
online discussions were the best part of the class. It does take a lot of
faculty time but asking good questions, making expectations clear, and guiding
the discussions by using tones, voices and critical thinking prompts pays off
for the faculty and the student.